Raul654 19:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC) I'm no biologist, but is pretty damn clear to me. As Borisblue says, at 100 pixels wide, it's just meaningless black lines. Descendall 18:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC) No, the karyotype is useless as a thumbnail. David Levy 03:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC) yeah it doesn't work particularly well as a thumbnail but how about this? Nil Einne 14:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Great idea. The phrase "All rights reserved" appears on both Flickr pages: /. How about we give it a shot? Nish kid 64 02:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Those images apparently were uploaded to the Commons with invalid licensing information (and should be deleted). Borisblue 02:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Those look good. Irongargoyle 01:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) This might do it: Image:Brushfield.jpg Borisblue 01:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC) How about these pictures from the turkish wikipedia?. I think I'll go look for a better image on commons. Nish kid 64 01:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Good point about the thumbnails. I also think a lot of people unfamiliar with karyotypes or biology in general would know what the new picture was. Borisblue 01:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC) I agree. Irongargoyle 01:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC) I'm really not sure that the karyotype will look anything more than random black lines once shrunk to thumbnail size. I don't object to the use of Image:Drill.jpg in the article, but I think the other one is simply more appropriate for our main page. I think Image:Down Syndrome Karyotype.png would be a much better replacement as this scientifically illustrates the cause of the phenomenon. PFHLai 10:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Thanks! Spebudmak 17:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Changing the imageĪre there any strong objections to my changing the picture illustrating Down syndrome on the main page? Some have brought up the point on the image talk page that this picture does not really do a good job of illustrating the condition. Spebudmak 01:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Thank you for pointing this out, Spebudmak. The confusion stems from the fact that astronomers typically call data which they take "observations", which in many cases are photos. Could that get clarified? Spebudmak 01:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC) P.S. In "On this Day" for Dec 4th, it says "1639 - English astronomer Jeremiah Horrocks made the first observation of a transit of Venus (pictured)." Taken literally this might be interpreted that this picture is an actual photo taken by Horrocks. PFHLai 10:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC) "On This Day" for Dec 4th Please be reminded to make use of Wikipedia:Village pump for suggestions like this. Cuivi é nen 23:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC) This is not related to MainPage at all. WiiWillieWiki 22:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User already does this on a volunteer basis. This way, a new user wouldn't have to wait so long to get that burning question answered. They would answer any questions the user had, one on one, using email, or their respective talk pages or IM screennames. Just have a list of all the unadopted new users, and let the experienced ones, (say, 2 months joined), choose one to mentor. I wonder how hard it would be to create a program like this, like Mechapixel did. 48 Citing SPECIFIC front page (including content) for an arbitrary day.30 Ipswich serial killer deserves mention?.29.8 Discussion on how the photo got to the main page.29.6 Someone added a disgusting picture in the main page.29 Discussion on the image on the Main Page.26 Time to put the Iranian conference story aside.13 Can I use my search engine to crawl into wikipedia?.12 Please ban our new friend, Bobby Steelworker the Bobby Boulders sockpuppet.7 Criticism of, or at least discussion of, Deletion Putsch.
4 How the "Complete List" link in interwiki area?.
0 kommentar(er)
